---
title: "AI Reality Check: Separating Hype from Practical Business Gains"
description: 60-70% of AI projects fail or underdeliver. Evidence-based guide separating genuine AI capability from vendor hype, with realistic ROI timelines, budgets, and proven use cases.
image: https://helium42.com/hubfs/blog/images/ai-reality-check-hero-hero-1.webp
---

[![Helium42](https://helium42.com/hubfs/raw_assets/public/Helium42%20Clean%20Pro%20Child%20Theme/images/logo.svg)](https://helium42.com/)

[Home](https://helium42.com)

AI Education ▾

- [Intro To AI Webinar](https://helium42.com/ai-education/intro-to-ai-webinar)
- [AI Marketing Workshop](https://helium42.com/ai-education/ai-marketing-workshop)
- [AI Sales Workshop](https://helium42.com/ai-education/ai-sales-workshop)

AI Implementation ▾

- [Salesman Sam](https://helium42.com/ai-implementation/pre-build-ai-solutions/salesman-sam)
- [Content System](https://helium42.com/ai-implementation/content-system)

AI Resources ▾

- [Blog](https://helium42.com/blog)
- [AI Policy Template](https://helium42.com/ai-usage-policy-guidelines-template)
- [ChatGPT For Business](https://helium42.com/gpt-business-bundle)
- [Complete Guide To Claude AI](https://helium42.com/complete-guide-claude-ai)
- [Free AI Marketing Strategy](https://helium42.com/ai-marketing-strategy)

[About Us](https://helium42.com/about-us) 

[Contact Us →](https://helium42.com/contact-us)

![Pencil-crayon illustration of a business executive examining an AI hype cycle chart comparing vendor promises against reality](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/ai-reality-check-hero-hero-1.webp?width=1600&height=900&name=ai-reality-check-hero-hero-1.webp)

Table of contents

Published by

![Peter Vogel](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Team/peter%20vogel%20round.png?width=54&height=54&name=peter%20vogel%20round.png)

Peter Vogel

Peter has led digital marketing transformation programmes for over 500 organisations across the UK and Europe, with particular expertise in marketing and sales team enablement. Together with Helium42 co-founder Clwyd ...

[AI Strategy](https://helium42.com/blog/tag/ai-strategy) [AI Consultancy](https://helium42.com/blog/tag/ai-consultancy) 

Mar 15, 2026, 7:00:00 AM

# AI Reality Check: Separating Hype from Practical Business Gains

Sixty to seventy percent of enterprise AI projects fail or significantly underdeliver against initial projections. Only 15–25% of organisations report measurable return on investment within 12 months. The difference between these two groups is not the technology — it is the rigour applied before, during, and after implementation. For UK businesses evaluating AI investments, an honest reality check is more valuable than any vendor pitch deck.

This guide separates genuine AI capability from marketing inflation. It covers where AI projects actually fail, which use cases deliver proven returns, how to spot vendor overclaiming, and what realistic timelines and budgets look like — structured for UK business leaders making investment decisions based on evidence rather than enthusiasm.

Key Takeaway

AI delivers genuine value in **customer service automation, document processing, and predictive analytics** — but only when implemented with realistic expectations. Gartner positions generative AI at the **"Peak of Inflated Expectations"** in its 2024 Hype Cycle. The organisations achieving positive ROI share three characteristics: they define success metrics before implementation, budget for 40–60% cost overruns, and treat AI as augmentation rather than replacement. Helium42 helps organisations distinguish viable AI opportunities from expensive experiments before committing investment.

60–70%

Of AI projects fail or underdeliver

15–25%

Report ROI within 12 months

40–60%

Typical cost overrun estimate

## Why AI Projects Fail: The Evidence

The failure statistics are not theoretical. Gartner, McKinsey, and the MIT Technology Review have each conducted large-scale surveys of enterprise AI deployment. The patterns are consistent:

- **Misaligned expectations:** 54% of AI projects begin without clear success metrics. Teams commit to implementation without defining what "success" looks like.
- **Inadequate data:** 48% of organisations lack the volume, quality, or labelling required to train effective models. Off-the-shelf models often perform poorly on bespoke business problems.
- **Change management failure:** 41% of deployments fail because staff are not trained, processes are not redesigned, or the business continues to operate in ways that undermine the technology.
- **Technical debt:** AI models deployed without governance frameworks create downstream costs. Retraining, monitoring, and maintenance often consume 60–70% of the lifetime cost.
- **Vendor over-claiming:** 36% of organisations report that their AI vendor promised significantly higher accuracy and faster deployment than was realistic.

These are not failures of technology. They are failures of discipline. The organisations that succeed in AI begin with honest questions: What problem are we solving? What data do we have? Who owns the outcome? What does failure cost us? How do we measure success after launch?

![Team reviewing AI project planning documentation](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/helium42-ai-planning-regen-webp-body-1.webp?width=1200&height=675&name=helium42-ai-planning-regen-webp-body-1.webp)

The difference between the 60–70% that fail and the 15–25% that deliver ROI is not intelligence or investment. It is clarity. Companies that define success metrics before implementation move into procurement and deployment with realistic timelines. They budget for overruns. They expect change management to take 6–12 months. They treat AI as augmentation — a tool that amplifies human decision-making — rather than as a replacement for human judgment.

For UK businesses, this matters because the cost of failure is high. An AI project that runs 18 months over budget and delivers 40% of promised accuracy has burned management credibility and resources. The next AI initiative — even a genuinely valuable one — will face resistance from the board and from staff who remember the last failed deployment.

## Where AI Actually Delivers ROI

The data shows clear patterns in where AI succeeds and where it remains experimental or high-risk:

### High-probability wins (60–75% success rates):

- **Customer service automation (document-based chatbots):** AI trained on your FAQ, knowledge base, or product documentation can safely handle 40–70% of common inquiries. Systems typically go live in 12–16 weeks with moderate data preparation. ROI achievable within 6–9 months. Constraint: Effectiveness plateaus when questions require cross-domain reasoning or judgment calls.
- **Invoice and document processing:** Optical character recognition (OCR) and machine learning can extract invoice fields, categorise expenses, and flag anomalies at 85–95% accuracy when templates are standardised. Implementation timelines: 8–12 weeks. ROI typically within 6 months through labour savings alone. This category has the most predictable success.
- **Predictive analytics on operational data:** If you have 2+ years of historical transaction, customer, or operational data, machine learning can forecast demand, flag churn risk, or predict equipment failures at accuracy rates of 70–85%. Payoff: Inventory optimisation, customer retention, or downtime prevention. Implementation: 14–20 weeks. ROI: 9–15 months, typically substantial.

![Dashboard displaying AI prediction model accuracy metrics](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/helium42-analytics-dashboard-regen-webp-body-1.webp?width=1200&height=675&name=helium42-analytics-dashboard-regen-webp-body-1.webp)

### Medium-probability (40–60% success):

- **Generative AI in content creation:** LLMs can draft marketing emails, product descriptions, or internal communications at 50–60% "first draft quality". Humans still need to review, edit, and fact-check. Payoff: 30–40% reduction in writing time. Not suitable for technical documentation, legal text, or customer-facing copy without heavy human oversight. Implementation and payoff timelines are short (weeks), but business value depends on existing workflows and quality standards.
- **Intelligent process automation:** Combining AI document classification with workflow automation can streamline loan applications, insurance claims, or hiring workflows. Success rates depend heavily on process stability and data quality. Typical timeline: 16–24 weeks. ROI: 12–18 months (medium-term payoff). Risk is higher if the underlying business process is not well-defined.

### High-risk or speculative (15–40% success):

- **Generative AI for decision-making:** Using large language models to make business decisions (hiring, credit approval, clinical diagnosis) is legally and operationally risky in the UK. Regulatory frameworks (particularly in finance and healthcare) require explainability and auditability. LLMs produce plausible-sounding outputs that are often confidently wrong. These systems require extensive validation, and success depends on strict governance. Implementation timelines stretch to 24+ weeks. Regulatory and liability costs can exceed ROI.
- **Fully autonomous systems:** Robots, autonomous vehicles, and fully automated manufacturing lines remain expensive and unpredictable. Most "autonomous" systems require human oversight. Timeline and cost overruns are endemic. Reserve for specialist use cases only.

## How to Spot Vendor Overclaiming

AI vendors have financial incentives to inflate accuracy estimates, compress timelines, and minimize the complexity of deployment. Here are the claims that typically signal over-promising:

Red flags in vendor claims:

- **"95%+ accuracy out of the box":** Accuracy measured on the vendor's test data, in their lab, on their problem domain. Accuracy on YOUR data, in YOUR system, on YOUR specific problem is typically 15–25% lower.
- **"Deployment in 4–8 weeks":** For document processing or narrowly scoped chatbots, this is possible. For anything involving your proprietary data, custom integrations, or business process redesign, add 50–100% to the timeline.
- **"Minimal data preparation required":** This is almost always false. Data labelling, cleaning, and feature engineering typically consume 40–60% of project time.
- **"Our system learns continuously":** Sounds good. In practice, continuous retraining without human oversight often causes model drift — gradual degradation in accuracy. Strong governance and regular auditing are required.
- **"No change management needed":** Any AI system that changes workflows requires [staff training](https://helium42.com/ai-training), process redesign, and buy-in. This is non-negotiable and takes months.
- **"You can build on this foundation":** This usually means the vendor's solution is intentionally under-scoped. Your "foundation" becomes 60% of the work. You are paying for a platform, not a solution.

When evaluating vendor claims, ask for three things: (1) case studies from organisations in your industry with similar data volumes and complexity, (2) a detailed project timeline with milestones and dependencies, and (3) the full cost of ownership, including training, maintenance, and retraining over 3 years.

If the vendor cannot provide these, the proposal is speculative. Walk away.

## Realistic Timelines and Budgets

Here is what a realistic AI project looks like, by category:

| Use Case | Typical timeline | Budget range (£) | ROI window |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Document processing | 8–12 weeks | £45,000–£120,000 | 4–7 months |
| Chatbot (FAQ-based) | 10–16 weeks | £35,000–£100,000 | 5–9 months |
| Predictive analytics | 14–20 weeks | £60,000–£180,000 | 9–15 months |
| Content generation workflow | 6–10 weeks | £25,000–£65,000 | 2–4 months |
| Process automation (multi-step) | 16–24 weeks | £80,000–£250,000 | 10–16 months |
| Predictive maintenance (custom) | 18–26 weeks | £100,000–£300,000+ | 12–20 months |

These ranges assume:

- Data is reasonably well-organized and accessible.
- Success metrics have been defined before the project begins.
- The organisation has allocated internal resources (domain experts, data analysts) to the project.
- Change management and staff training are budgeted separately.
- Post-launch monitoring and governance are in place.

If any of these assumptions do not hold, add 30–50% to the timeline and budget.

![Project timeline with phases: discovery, build, testing, deployment, governance](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/helium42-project-timeline-regen-webp-body-1.webp?width=1200&height=675&name=helium42-project-timeline-regen-webp-body-1.webp)

## The Three Characteristics of Successful AI Deployments

Organisations that achieve positive ROI within 12 months share three things in common. Understanding these is more valuable than any technology roadmap:

### 1. Success metrics defined before implementation

Before a single line of code is written, successful teams answer: What is success? If the AI system reduces customer service response time from 4 hours to 2 hours, and accuracy on first-contact resolution improves from 72% to 82%, is that success? By how much must accuracy improve to justify the investment? What happens if the system works perfectly for high-value customers but performs poorly on a specific segment?

These questions seem obvious in retrospect. In practice, most AI projects begin without clear answers. When the system launches with 78% accuracy and 6-week deployment (versus the promised 95% and 4 weeks), the organisation cannot decide whether it is acceptable because "acceptable" was never defined.

### 2. Budget reserves of 40–60% for overruns

This is not pessimism. This is data. McKinsey's 2023 survey found that 74% of AI projects exceeded the initial budget. The average overrun was 47%. UK organisations that budgeted for 40% contingency moved into implementation confident that minor delays and cost adjustments were manageable. Those that budgeted 10% faced difficult trade-offs between scope and timeline.

Similarly, build a 30-week timeline estimate, then inform stakeholders that the launch target is 20 weeks, with full delivery expected in 26 weeks and a known-risk window through 30 weeks. This positions the team to deliver early and maintain credibility.

### 3. AI as augmentation, not replacement

Every successful AI system in production is augmenting human decision-making, not replacing it. Customer service chatbots escalate complex queries to humans. Predictive systems flag at-risk accounts for human review. Document processing systems flag exceptions for manual approval. Diagnostic aids propose treatments, but doctors decide.

This is not a technology limitation. It is a governance requirement. AI systems make mistakes in systematic, often subtle, ways that are visible only in retrospect. Organisations that build in human oversight — by design, not as a fallback — catch failures faster, retain staff buy-in, and manage liability.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### What percentage of AI projects fail?

Research from Gartner and McKinsey consistently shows that 60-70% of enterprise AI projects fail or significantly underdeliver against initial projections. The primary causes are poor data quality (68% of failures), unrealistic expectations (62%), and insufficient change management (59%). Only 20% of AI investments scale beyond proof-of-concept within two years.

### Is AI overhyped for business?

Generative AI sits at the Peak of Inflated Expectations on Gartner's Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. This means vendor promises significantly exceed demonstrated capability. AI delivers genuine value in specific, well-defined use cases but the current market conversation overstates what AI can deliver in the near term.

### How long does AI take to show ROI?

The median time to realise measurable value from AI is 18-24 months, significantly longer than the 6-12 months vendors typically project. Customer service automation and content generation can reach breakeven in 8-18 months. Budget for 1.5x the vendor's projected timeline.

### When should a business NOT use AI?

AI is not the right tool when the problem involves structured, historical data with clear feature relationships — traditional machine learning outperforms LLMs in 40% of evaluated use cases and costs 3-10x less. AI also fails when the use case requires near-zero error rates, when data quality is poor, or when change management investment is insufficient.

### How much should I budget for an AI project?

Budget 1.5x the vendor estimate to account for typical cost overruns of 27-53%. For mid-market UK organisations, realistic annual costs range from £60,000 to £500,000 depending on deployment complexity. Allocate 15-20% of total budget to change management and reserve 10-15% contingency.

## What This Means for Your Organisation

The honest truth is that most AI projects will not deliver on the initial pitch. Timelines will slip. Accuracy will be lower than promised. Costs will exceed estimates. Processes will be slower to change than expected. Staff adoption will be more difficult than anticipated.

But organisations that separate feasible AI opportunities from speculative ones, that define success clearly, that budget for realistic timelines and cost overruns, and that treat AI as augmentation rather than replacement — those organisations will see positive ROI within 12–18 months. They will retain staff confidence. They will build a foundation for the next AI initiative.

The question is not whether AI can deliver value. It can. The question is whether your organisation will commit the discipline — the planning, the governance, the realism — to extract that value.

For UK business leaders making these decisions, that discipline is worth more than any technology platform.

---

This guide synthesises research from Gartner, McKinsey, MIT Technology Review, and 40+ AI deployment case studies across financial services, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing. All data is current as of Q4 2025.

Want a reality check on your AI plan?

Helium42 conducts AI readiness audits for UK organisations evaluating AI investments. We help you distinguish viable opportunities from expensive experiments — before committing budget. [Learn about AI Consultancy services](https://helium42.com/ai-consultancy).

[AI in legal practice](https://helium42.com/blog/ai-for-law-firms)

Continue reading

## More on AI Strategy.

### [![Law firm supervision chain for AI-assisted drafting, from fee-earner verification through to partner sign-off](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/legal-ai-supervision-chain-hero-1.webp?width=600&height=450&name=legal-ai-supervision-chain-hero-1.webp) AI Legal Drafting Implementation: A Rollout Guide for UK Firms AI legal drafting implementation is the operational work of embedding AI-assisted drafting into a law firm's ... Aug 9, 2026, 4:00:00 AM](https://helium42.com/blog/ai-legal-drafting-implementation-guide)

### [![A marketing leader reviewing an AI-readiness dashboard across data, skills, governance and process](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/ai-readiness-md-dashboard-20260722-224137.webp?width=600&height=450&name=ai-readiness-md-dashboard-20260722-224137.webp) AI Strategy AI Readiness for Marketing Leaders: The 2026 Diagnostic Guide AI readiness for a marketing function is the combination of data, skills, governance, process, tooling and ... Jul 22, 2026, 4:00:00 AM](https://helium42.com/blog/ai-readiness-for-marketing-leaders)

### [![A UK law firm protecting confidential client data while using AI, with a secure vault and legal case files](https://helium42.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/private-legal-ai-confidentiality-20260722-230142.webp?width=600&height=450&name=private-legal-ai-confidentiality-20260722-230142.webp) AI Implementation Private and Secure AI Deployment for UK Law Firms (2026) Deploying AI privately in a law firm means choosing a model — public tool, enterprise service with a ... Jul 22, 2026, 4:00:00 AM](https://helium42.com/blog/private-legal-ai-deployment)

AI transparency

## How AI shows up in this article.

- **Drafted with AI assistance.** Research and draft prepared via frontier large language models, then human-edited by the named author.
- **Sources checked.** Statistics and citations are checked against their cited sources, and we are re-verifying older articles during 2026. If you spot an error, email [info@helium42.com](mailto:info@helium42.com) and we will correct it and date the correction.
- **Compliance posture.** EU AI Act Article 50 transparency obligations (applicable from 2 August 2026) and the UK GDPR transparency principle.

AI Newsletter

## Weekly AI insights for B2B leaders.

Practical use-cases, real client wins, and the tools we run in production. One email a week. No drip sequences, no upsells.

- **Founders write it.** Not a content team, not an AI summary — the same people delivering Helium42 engagements.
- **One email a week.** Friday morning, three to five practical items.
- **Cancel any time.** Unsubscribe link in every issue.

Want the methodology?

## The system that produced this article.

Every post on the Helium42 blog is produced through The Content System — our productised, 9-phase AI content methodology with quality gates between each phase.

[See The Content System →](https://helium42.com/ai-implementation/content-system) [Book a discovery call →](https://helium42.com/contact-us)

![Helium42](https://helium42.com/hubfs/raw_assets/public/Helium42%20Clean%20Pro%20Child%20Theme/images/logo.svg)

Practical AI transformation for European mid-market leaders. London & Hamminkeln.

#### Solutions

- [The Content System](https://helium42.com/#content-system)
- [Salesman Sam](https://helium42.com/ai-implementation/pre-build-ai-solutions/salesman-sam)
- [AI Training](https://helium42.com/ai-training)
- [Strategic Consultancy](https://helium42.com/ai-consultancy)

#### Company

- [About](https://helium42.com/about-us)
- [Methodology](https://helium42.com/#approach)
- [FAQ](https://helium42.com/#faq)
- [Contact](https://helium42.com/contact-us)
- [Blog](https://helium42.com/blog)

#### Contact

- [info@helium42.com](mailto:info@helium42.com)
- [+44 (0) 208 834 4795](tel:+442088344795)
- 80A Uxbridge Road, W12 8LR
- London · Hamminkeln

© 2026 Helium42. All rights reserved.

[Privacy](https://helium42.com/privacy-policy) [Terms](https://helium42.com/terms-of-service) [Disclaimer](https://helium42.com/disclaimer) [Anti-Spam](https://helium42.com/anti-spam-policy)

Helium42 is a trading name of White Hat SEO Limited, registered in England and Wales, company number 07802734. Registered office: 75 Aston Road, Shifnal, England, TF11 8DU.

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Peter Vogel",
    "url" : "https://helium42.com/blog/author/peter-vogel"
  },
  "datePublished" : "2026-03-15T11:00:00.000Z",
  "headline" : "AI Reality Check: Separating Hype from Practical Business Gains",
  "image" : [ "https://helium42.com/hubfs/blog/images/ai-reality-check-hero-hero-1.webp" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://helium42.com/blog/ai-reality-check",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://helium42.com/hubfs/Favicon-1.png"
    }
  }
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity" : [ {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Research from Gartner and McKinsey consistently shows that 60-70% of enterprise AI projects fail or significantly underdeliver against initial projections. The primary causes are poor data quality (68% of failures), unrealistic expectations (62%), and insufficient change management (59%). Only 20% of AI investments scale beyond proof-of-concept within two years."
    },
    "name" : "What percentage of AI projects fail?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Generative AI sits at the Peak of Inflated Expectations on Gartner's Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. This means vendor promises significantly exceed demonstrated capability. AI delivers genuine value in specific, well-defined use cases but the current market conversation overstates what AI can deliver in the near term."
    },
    "name" : "Is AI overhyped for business?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "The median time to realise measurable value from AI is 18-24 months, significantly longer than the 6-12 months vendors typically project. Customer service automation and content generation can reach breakeven in 8-18 months. Budget for 1.5x the vendor's projected timeline."
    },
    "name" : "How long does AI take to show ROI?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "AI is not the right tool when the problem involves structured, historical data with clear feature relationships — traditional machine learning outperforms LLMs in 40% of evaluated use cases and costs 3-10x less. AI also fails when the use case requires near-zero error rates, when data quality is poor, or when change management investment is insufficient."
    },
    "name" : "When should a business NOT use AI?"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Question",
    "acceptedAnswer" : {
      "@type" : "Answer",
      "text" : "Budget 1.5x the vendor estimate to account for typical cost overruns of 27-53%. For mid-market UK organisations, realistic annual costs range from £60,000 to £500,000 depending on deployment complexity. Allocate 15-20% of total budget to change management and reserve 10-15% contingency."
    },
    "name" : "How much should I budget for an AI project?"
  } ]
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#organization",
  "@type" : "Organization",
  "areaServed" : [ {
    "@type" : "Country",
    "name" : "United Kingdom"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Country",
    "name" : "Germany"
  }, {
    "@type" : "Place",
    "name" : "Europe"
  } ],
  "contactPoint" : [ {
    "@type" : "ContactPoint",
    "areaServed" : [ "GB", "DE", "EU" ],
    "availableLanguage" : [ "en", "de" ],
    "contactType" : "customer support",
    "email" : "info@helium42.com",
    "telephone" : "+44 208 834 4795"
  } ],
  "description" : "Helium42 is an AI consultancy based in London and Hamminkeln. We deliver practical AI transformation for European mid-market leaders through an AI-produced content system, the Salesman Sam sales agent, hands-on education, and strategic consultancy.",
  "foundingLocation" : {
    "@type" : "Place",
    "name" : "London, United Kingdom"
  },
  "knowsAbout" : [ "Artificial Intelligence", "AI Consultancy", "AI Implementation", "AI Education", "Content Automation", "Answer Engine Optimization", "Sales Automation", "HubSpot CMS", "Business Transformation" ],
  "legalName" : "White Hat SEO Limited",
  "logo" : {
    "@type" : "ImageObject",
    "height" : 342,
    "url" : "https://145656140.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/145656140/brand/helium42-logo-schema.png",
    "width" : 1008
  },
  "name" : "Helium42",
  "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/company/helium42" ],
  "url" : "https://helium42.com"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#office-london",
  "@type" : "LocalBusiness",
  "address" : {
    "@type" : "PostalAddress",
    "addressCountry" : "GB",
    "addressLocality" : "London",
    "postalCode" : "W12 8LR",
    "streetAddress" : "80A Uxbridge Road"
  },
  "email" : "info@helium42.com",
  "geo" : {
    "@type" : "GeoCoordinates",
    "latitude" : 51.5074,
    "longitude" : -0.1278
  },
  "name" : "Helium42 London",
  "parentOrganization" : {
    "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#organization"
  },
  "telephone" : "+44 208 834 4795",
  "url" : "https://helium42.com"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#office-hamminkeln",
  "@type" : "LocalBusiness",
  "address" : {
    "@type" : "PostalAddress",
    "addressCountry" : "DE",
    "addressLocality" : "Hamminkeln"
  },
  "email" : "info@helium42.com",
  "name" : "Helium42 Hamminkeln",
  "parentOrganization" : {
    "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#organization"
  },
  "url" : "https://helium42.com"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#website",
  "@type" : "WebSite",
  "inLanguage" : "en-GB",
  "name" : "Helium42",
  "potentialAction" : {
    "@type" : "SearchAction",
    "query-input" : "required name=search_term_string",
    "target" : {
      "@type" : "EntryPoint",
      "urlTemplate" : "https://helium42.com/?s={search_term_string}"
    }
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#organization"
  },
  "url" : "https://helium42.com"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://helium42.com/blog/ai-reality-check#post",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Peter Vogel"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2026-08-04T16:10:02+00:00",
  "datePublished" : "2026-03-15T11:00:00+00:00",
  "description" : "Sixty to seventy percent of enterprise AI projects fail or significantly underdeliver against initial projections. Only 15–25% of organisations report measurable return on investment within 12 months. The difference ...",
  "headline" : "AI Reality Check: Separating Hype from Practical Business Gains",
  "image" : "https://145656140.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net/hubfs/145656140/blog/images/ai-reality-check-hero-hero-1.webp",
  "inLanguage" : "en-GB",
  "isPartOf" : {
    "@id" : "https://helium42.com/blog#blog"
  },
  "keywords" : "AI Strategy, AI Consultancy",
  "mainEntityOfPage" : "https://helium42.com/blog/ai-reality-check",
  "publisher" : {
    "@id" : "https://helium42.com/#organization"
  },
  "url" : "https://helium42.com/blog/ai-reality-check"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BreadcrumbList",
  "itemListElement" : [ {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://helium42.com/",
    "name" : "Home",
    "position" : 1
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://helium42.com/blog",
    "name" : "Blog",
    "position" : 2
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://helium42.com/blog/tag/ai-strategy",
    "name" : "AI Strategy",
    "position" : 3
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://helium42.com/blog/ai-reality-check",
    "name" : "AI Reality Check: Separating Hype from Practical Business ...",
    "position" : 4
  } ]
}
```